Cloud Consulting Services that name what to change, and what to leave alone.

We scope before we quote, because a headline price would be wrong for almost everyone who reads it. Cost tracks how many accounts are in scope, how much of the estate needs reviewing, and whether you want the AI-readiness half alongside the cost teardown. The audit is fixed-scope: we agree the accounts, the timeframe, and the deliverable before anything starts, so the review cannot run away from you, and it is quoted outcome based, per project. If execution follows and you want a team of ours to run it, that is team extension, billed monthly per team member. We do not publish project-level price bands, because on this kind of work they mislead more often than they help.

It depends on how much estate there is, and we tell you the timeframe before you commit rather than after. A single-account cost review is short; a multi-account estate reviewed alongside an AI-readiness assessment takes longer, and we say which of the two you are before we begin. Because the audit is fixed-scope, the duration is agreed with the scope, so you know the deliverable and the end date together. Any build that follows is estimated separately, once there is a roadmap to estimate against.

Integration is usually where the schedule risk actually lives, so we map it first. On a hotel booking platform we migrated, the hard part was not the cloud, it was the Opera Cloud, IBS Software, and Shift4 integrations that had to keep working, so we built a booking engine that sits as middleware between the platform and those systems. On a B2B CRM moving off on-premise infrastructure we mapped dependencies, critical services and bottlenecks before touching anything. Your ERP, CRM, payment providers, and data warehouse get named in the assessment rather than discovered in week six.

We start by reading the stack you already run and the growth you are planning for, then weigh public, private, and hybrid against it rather than applying one shape to everyone. What comes back names which workloads should move, in what order, and what breaks when they do. If the estate you have is the right one and the budget would do more somewhere else, the readout says that instead.

Yes. We run a deep-dive audit to find unused resources, optimize licensing, and put automated cost controls in place. In our delivery experience, right-sizing and removing waste produces immediate savings in the 20% to 40% range, and a New York B2B SaaS client credits us on Clutch with cutting their AWS costs by 30% or more. Your figure depends on your starting point, which is exactly what the audit measures.

Ask them first, honestly. They know the system, they are cheaper to brief, and on a healthy estate that is the end of it. What nobody can do is review their own architecture from a neutral position, which is the thing you are buying here rather than a criticism of them. If a review already exists we read it instead of billing you to repeat it, and where it says the architecture is sound, that is what our readout says too. We are equally happy to hand the roadmap back to them to execute: it is written to be usable by whoever ends up doing the work.

Technology is only half the battle, so the consulting includes who owns what afterwards: the roles and responsibilities the new setup needs, and the training that goes with them. The handover is part of the deliverable, in writing, so the environment does not depend on us to stay healthy.

unicrew holds ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015, renewed through a multi-stage audit with Quay Audit UK, and ISTQB certified QA sits inside delivery rather than bolted on at the end. We do not hold SOC 2, and if your procurement process requires it you should know that before you shortlist us. For the audit itself we work from read access to billing and architecture under NDA, with the accounts in view agreed before we start, so nothing outside that scope is touched.

Every firm on your list will claim independent judgment about your cloud, this page included, so compare on the things that can be checked before you sign. Three of them, and all three are fair to put to us. What access does the review need, and what does it not touch: ours is read access to billing and architecture under NDA, the accounts named in writing, no write access to production. Who can execute the result: a roadmap that only works while the firm that wrote it holds the pen is a dependency, not a plan, so ask whether your own team or a third firm could pick it up. And what does the firm not hold: we hold ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015, audited by Quay Audit UK, and we do not hold SOC 2. Every client quoted on this page opens their own Clutch review. Read the interview rather than the rating. Worth naming a non-vendor option too: a cloud cost management tool buys continuous visibility across an estate several teams deploy into, which is a real thing to want. It also adds a licence to the bill it measures, and it will not re-architect anything or make the move-or-stay call.