Senior engineers for US startups and scaleups when hiring cannot move fast enough.

Because they answer different questions. A permanent hire is right for a role you will still need in three years, and we will say so on the call. An outside team is right when the roadmap is already committed and the capacity has to exist this quarter: most engagements start within two to four weeks of signature, and team extension is billed monthly, so the seats come back off when a quarter goes quiet.

Our engineers work from Europe, so the overlap window is something we agree at scoping rather than promise on a landing page. What clients describe is a live daily meeting. Stephanie Allemann, president of Crik-IT in Maine, put it this way on Clutch: "We have a daily status meeting over Google Meet. They're ahead of me, so we meet in their evening time in Ukraine. The accommodations they've made for US time have been great."

unicrew publishes no project price band, because an honest figure depends on team shape, stack and scope. What is settled before you commit is how you are billed: time and materials, quoted per project and billed hourly; fixed price, quoted per project against an agreed outcome; or team extension, billed monthly per team member. There is no recruitment or placement fee on a dedicated team or team extension.

Growing an existing engagement is faster than starting one, because the team already knows the product. The CTO of a German science tech company describes it on Clutch: "They return with two or three high-quality developers when we need another resource. We've had difficulty choosing between them because they're all so good." We will not promise engineers tomorrow, because staffing senior people responsibly takes longer than that.

Yes, and it is a common way engagements here begin. We read what exists and say plainly what is salvageable before anybody quotes a rewrite. One US consumer health platform arrived mid-crisis with recurring outages: we stabilized it, brought its cloud costs down, and are still the team on it. If a rewrite genuinely beats a rescue, you get that answer with the tradeoffs written down.

Yes, and it is a defined offer rather than an open-ended discovery phase. MVP in 6 Weeks takes a product idea to a working, usable first version in six weeks, on a fixed scope agreed before we start, so you learn what works before committing budget to a larger build. What you bring to it is the product decisions and access to real users.

When you need engineers sitting in your office, because ours work remotely. When the product decisions have not been made and you are hoping an outside team will make them. When you want a technical co-founder paid in equity rather than invoiced, which is not an arrangement we offer. And unicrew runs no investor or accelerator network, so nobody here is going to introduce you to a fund.