Cybersecurity Consulting Services for a product that keeps changing after the assessment.

A cybersecurity consultant assesses risk, designs the security strategy, and helps an organization prevent, detect and respond to threats: secure architecture, compliance readiness, incident response planning, ongoing risk management. At unicrew the consultant does not stop at the report, because the same people can implement the remediation in your codebase and pipeline.

Every engagement is quoted against its own scope, because the same scope on two different products is not the same job. Four things move it: how many products and environments are in view, which standards you answer to (one questionnaire is a much smaller piece of work than ISO 27001 plus GDPR plus NIS2), how much evidence already exists to reuse, and whether we implement the fixes or hand them over. A fixed-scope review is quoted per project, outcome based. Remediation is billed hourly, quoted per project. A security engineer inside your team is billed monthly, per team member. The number is agreed before anything starts, and there is no minimum engagement period.

The readiness review is a fixed-scope sprint, so the timeframe is settled at scoping alongside the price and the deliverable, and you have all three before you commit to any of them. One product against one questionnaire is short. Several environments and several regulations take longer, and which one you are buying is settled at scoping rather than discovered in week six. Remediation runs on its own schedule, sized against the roadmap the review produces. Most engagements start within two to four weeks.

No, and a recommendation that starts with a migration is one we would have to justify twice. The stacks we secure are the ones we build in: .NET and ASP.NET, PHP, Node.js, Angular, React and Vue, on AWS with Docker containers, MS SQL, MySQL or PostgreSQL. The work happens inside your repository, your pipeline and your issue tracker, so a secure SDLC change arrives as a pull request your own reviewers approve rather than as a document asking somebody to find time.

We work through GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and, for EU entities, NIS2: assessing the gaps, supporting the documentation, implementing the technical controls. Because unicrew has been through a multi-stage ISO 27001:2022 audit itself, the advice comes from people who have sat on the other side of the audit table. We are precise about the limits: ISO 27001 maps to roughly 70 to 80 percent of NIS2's baseline requirements (Reed Smith, January 2026), and we work the remaining distance with you.

Getting you ready is ours; issuing the certificate is an accredited body's, and nobody else's. HIPAA is a different shape again, and worth saying plainly: HIPAA has no certification body. Compliance is a continuing obligation of the covered entity, not something a development partner can confer. Ours is the work an examination looks at: the controls themselves, the technical safeguards, and the documentation trail it asks to see, which is the work that came before any code on a HIPAA compliant consultation platform.

Compare on four questions that survive a sales call, and we answer all four before you sign. What certification does the firm hold, and who audited it: ours is ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015, audited by Quay Audit UK, which the next answer covers in full. How big is the security practice and who inside it does the work: ours is one dedicated security engineer plus a part-time senior security consultant, working inside delivery. Can the people who write the findings also merge the fix, because that decides whose backlog the remediation lands in: ours can. And the review behind any client a firm quotes: every review on this page links to the interview it came from.

unicrew holds ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015, renewed through a multi-stage audit with Quay Audit UK, and ISO 27001:2022 is the internationally accepted equivalent in US security reviews. GDPR and NIS2 are covered too. Where a client needs SOC 2, we can build the controls and assemble the evidence trail the audit asks for; the report itself comes from the accredited auditor who performs it.

Reviews from security work inside our delivery engagements, each linked to the interview it came from rather than to a rating, so any of it can be checked without asking us. WaiverKing's CEO describes the platform keeping its security compliance current as the regulations changed, and a client commissioned a third-party read of our code and described it on Clutch. Behind them sit the certification we hold and the builds themselves: a HIPAA compliant consultation platform, and a multi-factor authentication platform whose data layer we re-architected.

Whoever you decide, and it is a decision you make after the report rather than before it. The roadmap is sequenced so your own engineers could work through it start to finish. Where you would rather they did not, ours do it in the repository and pipeline you already use: secure SDLC and DevSecOps changes, vulnerability remediation, architecture and access-control work, with every finding we close checked again afterwards. The reason this page exists is that those two options usually come from two different companies.

A small step now: knowing which three things you would have to fix when the first enterprise questionnaire, regulation or incident arrives. That is a conversation rather than an engagement, and it is worth having early, because the cost does not disappear while you wait, it arrives all at once and tends to turn up with a date attached. With no regulation, no buyer asking and no personal or payment data stored, that conversation is all you need until one of those changes.