Cybersecurity Consulting Services for a product that keeps changing after the assessment.

A cybersecurity consultant assesses risk, designs the security strategy, and helps an organization prevent, detect and respond to threats: secure architecture, compliance readiness, incident response planning, ongoing risk management. At unicrew the consultant does not stop at the report, because the same people can implement the remediation in your codebase and pipeline.

There is no headline number, because the same scope on two different products is not the same job. Four things move it: how many products and environments are in view, which standards you answer to (one questionnaire is a much smaller piece of work than ISO 27001 plus GDPR plus NIS2), how much evidence already exists to reuse, and whether we implement the fixes or hand them over. A fixed-scope review is quoted per project, outcome based. Remediation is billed hourly, quoted per project. A security engineer inside your team is billed monthly, per team member. The number is agreed before anything starts, and there is no minimum engagement period.

The readiness review is a fixed-scope sprint, so the timeframe is settled at scoping alongside the price and the deliverable, and you have all three before you commit to any of them. One product against one questionnaire is short. Several environments and several regulations take longer, and which one you are buying is settled at scoping rather than discovered in week six. Remediation runs on its own schedule, sized against the roadmap the review produces. Most engagements start within two to four weeks.

No, and a recommendation that starts with a migration is one we would have to justify twice. The stacks we secure are the ones we build in: .NET and ASP.NET, PHP, Node.js, Angular, React and Vue, on AWS with Docker containers, MS SQL, MySQL or PostgreSQL. The work happens inside your repository, your pipeline and your issue tracker, so a secure SDLC change arrives as a pull request your own reviewers approve rather than as a document asking somebody to find time.

We work through GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and, for EU entities, NIS2: assessing the gaps, supporting the documentation, implementing the technical controls. Because unicrew has been through a multi-stage ISO 27001:2022 audit itself, the advice comes from people who have sat on the other side of the audit table. We are precise about the limits: ISO 27001 maps to roughly 70 to 80 percent of NIS2's baseline requirements (Reed Smith, January 2026), and we work the remaining distance with you.

Getting you ready is ours; issuing the certificate is an accredited body's, and nobody else's. HIPAA is a different shape again, and worth saying plainly: HIPAA has no certification body. Compliance is a continuing obligation of the covered entity, not something a development partner can confer. What is left for us is the useful part: the controls themselves, the technical safeguards, and the documentation trail an examination asks to see, which is the work that came before any code on a HIPAA compliant consultation platform.

Below the category, because the assessment plus the remediation is a claim every full-service vendor can make, this page included. Four questions survive a sales call, and every one of them works on us too. What certification does the firm hold, and who audited it: ours is ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015, audited by Quay Audit UK, and we do not hold SOC 2, which the next answer covers in full. How big is the security practice and who inside it does the work: ours is one dedicated security engineer plus a part-time senior security consultant, and that shape is exactly why monitoring, red teaming and the certification audit go to somebody else. Can the people who write the findings also merge the fix, because that decides whose backlog the remediation lands in. And open the review behind any client a vendor quotes, instead of reading the rating on top of it.

No. unicrew holds ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 9001:2015, renewed through a multi-stage audit with Quay Audit UK, and ISO 27001:2022 is the internationally accepted equivalent in US security reviews. Where a client needs SOC 2, we can build the controls and assemble the evidence trail the audit asks for; the report itself comes from the accredited auditor who performs it.

Not for standalone security audits. What the reviews on this page cover is delivery work, each one linked to the interview it came from rather than to a rating, so any of it can be checked without asking us. The independent security signal closest to this page is a third-party read of our code that a client commissioned and then described on Clutch. After that it is the certification we hold and the builds themselves: a HIPAA compliant consultation platform, and a multi-factor authentication platform whose data layer we re-architected.

Whoever you decide, and it is a decision you make after the report rather than before it. The roadmap is sequenced so your own engineers could work through it start to finish. Where you would rather they did not, ours do it in the repository and pipeline you already use: secure SDLC and DevSecOps changes, vulnerability remediation, architecture and access-control work, with every finding we close checked again afterwards. The reason this page exists is that those two options usually come from two different companies.

Probably not, and that is a real answer rather than a modest one. If no regulation applies to you, no buyer is asking, and you store no personal or payment data, then waiting is a defensible call. What changes the arithmetic is that the cost does not disappear while you wait, it arrives all at once: the first enterprise questionnaire, the first regulation that catches you, or the first incident tends to turn up with a date attached. The cheap version of this is knowing which three things you would have to fix when that happens, which is a conversation rather than an engagement.